The Fine-Tuning of Molecular Machines

sixdaysblog

Evolutionists have long sought to discredit opposing views, shutting them down in public schools, colleges, and science journals. In public schools, for example, dissent was blocked in the Dover vs. Kitzmiller trial, where the court prohibited the teaching of Intelligent Design (ID). This amounted to censorship. However, occasionally, opposing voices have won, and that recently happened in the science journal, Science Direct.

Whenever the topic of evolution vs. creation and intelligent design are discussed, one popular talking point espoused by evolutionists is the belief that creation and ID cannot be valid forms of science because their ideas aren’t published in science journals. This claim is both false and deceptive because creationists and ID proponents are published in peer reviewed journals frequently; the real issue is that they typically have to publish their work within their own circles due to overt discrimination by evolutionists, who refuse to publish ID or creationist…

View original post 453 more words

Posted on October 18, 2020, in Miscellaneous. Bookmark the permalink. 1 Comment.

  1. Thanks! Appreciate the reblog.

    Liked by 1 person

Failing Pastor

By all measures of pastoral success; I am a disaster

Dumbest Blog Ever

Stu[pidity] on Stareoids

Kingdom Pastor

Living Freely In God's Kingdom

Squid's Cup of Tea

seeking shalom through wrestling well

ApoloJedi

Discussing Biblical Authority

sixdaysblog

For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy. (Exodus 20:11)

My Rainy, Windy Life

Life is not mundane.

His Eternal Word

Psalm 119:89,"Forever, O LORD, thy word is settled in heaven"

Tulips & Honey

Christian, wife, mom, homeschooler, podcaster

%d bloggers like this: